O professor Francione afirma que o “Direito Animal” deveria estar voltado para a abolição incremental da condição de propriedade dos animais não-humanos, e classifica como equivocada a tendência que os advogados do “Direito Animal” têm de se concentrar em casos envolvendo crueldade, guarda de animais de estimação, tratamento veterinário inadequado e arranjos para que nada falte ao “pet” depois que seu dono morrer.
Recent Posts
- Green Party, Extinction Rebellion, and Others: Stop Ignoring the Vegan Solution
- Karl Lagerfeld Had a Point: If You Are Not Vegan, Why Do You Protest Fur?
- Morality in the Age of Reality TV: Bribing the Pope to Adopt a Vegan Diet for Lent
- If You Are Not a Vegan, I Have a Simple Question for You: Why Not?
- Guest Essay from Macrobiotic Pioneer, Marlene Watson-Tara: “Go Vegan – It’s Easy”
- Aspiring to Act Justly and Fairly Is Not “Sh*t”
- Should Animal Rights Advocates Promote “In-Vitro” or “Cultured” Meat?
- Abolitionist Approach Podcast: An Easy Way to Start a Conversation About Veganism
- Abolitionist Approach Podcast: On the Misuse of “Abolition”
- Abolitionist Approach Podcast: On Anthony Bourdain, Veganism, and Bad Behavior by Some “Animal People”
Animal Kill Counter
Number of animals killed in the world by the meat, dairy and egg industries, since you opened this webpage. This does not include the billions of fish and other aquatic animals killed annually.
Based on 2007 statistics from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations' Global Livestock Production and Health Atlas.
Get this counter at beAutomated